ABSTRACT
With the success of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic and CAR T-cell therapies in clinical trials, there is growing opportunity for immunotherapies in the treatment of many types of cancers. Lentiviral vectors have proven effective at delivery of genetic material or gene editing technology for ex vivo processing, but the benefits and promise of Adeno-associated virus (AAV) and mRNA tools for in vivo immunotherapy have garnered recent interest. Here we describe complete synthetic solutions for immuno-oncology research programs using either mRNA-vaccines or virus-mediated cell and gene engineering. These solutions optimize workflows to minimize screening time while maximizing successful research results through: (1) Efficiency in lentiviral packaging with versatility in titer options for high-quality particles. (2) A highthroughput viral packaging process to enable rapid downstream screening. (3) Proprietary plasmid synthesis and preparation techniques to maintain ITR integrity through AAV packaging and improve gene delivery. (4) Rapid synthesis, in vitro transcription, and novel sequencing of mRNA constructs for complete characterization of critical components such as the polyA tail. The reported research demonstrates a streamlined approach that improves data quality through innovative synthesis and sequencing methodologies as compared to current standard practices.
ABSTRACT
Delivery of self-amplifying mRNA (SAM) has high potential for infectious disease vaccination due to its self-adjuvanting and dose-sparing properties. Yet a challenge is the susceptibility of SAM to degradation and the need for SAM to reach the cytosol fully intact to enable self-amplification. Lipid nanoparticles are successfully deployed at incredible speed for mRNA vaccination, but aspects such as cold storage, manufacturing, efficiency of delivery, and the therapeutic window can benefit from further improvement. To investigate alternatives to lipid nanoparticles, a class of >200 biodegradable end-capped lipophilic poly(beta-amino ester)s (PBAEs) that enable efficient delivery of SAM in vitro and in vivo as assessed by measuring expression of SAM encoding reporter proteins is developed. The ability of these polymers to deliver SAM intramuscularly in mice is evaluated, and a polymer-based formulation that yields up to 37-fold higher intramuscular (IM) expression of SAM compared to injected naked SAM is identified. Using the same nanoparticle formulation to deliver a SAM encoding rabies virus glycoprotein, the vaccine elicits superior immunogenicity compared to naked SAM delivery, leading to seroconversion in mice at low RNA injection doses. These biodegradable nanomaterials may be useful in the development of next-generation RNA vaccines for infectious diseases.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Advanced Therapeutics published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
ABSTRACT
Messenger RNAmRNAmedicine was urgently approved in 2020 as a vaccine for COVID-19 . However, current mRNA therapeutics are not fully established, with challenges remaining in translation efficiency and drug delivery system. Therefore, further research is needed to adapt mRNA therapeutics to other diseases. Furthermore, the preparation of mRNA drugs is time-consuming and costly because of the biological methods used. Our laboratory has been working on chemical methods to solve these issues. In this paper, we introduce chemical modifications and novel capping reactions as a method to improve the translation efficiency of mRNA and the introduction of disulfide modification to oligonucleotide therapeutics as an effort on the drug delivery system.Copyright © 2023, Japan Society of Drug Delivery System. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: A new generation of vaccine technology platform has been developed to combat the COVID- 19 pandemic, the mRNA vaccine. The EMA granted the Pfizer- BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine an emergency use authorization in December 2020 with limited clinical experience, especially in the pediatric population. Method(s): Here, we present a case-report of a 17-yearold girl, who was vaccinated with the mRNA-COVID vaccine in October 2021, and developed a gross hematuria and proteinuria the day after the vaccination. Result(s): The patient presented at our outpatient clinic three days after the vaccination with new-onset hematuria and proteinuria. Up to this date, she had no former known medical conditions and the family history was negative regarding kidney diseases. We excluded nephrolithiasis, autoimmune glomerulonephritis and urinary tract infection as causes. The laboratory chemistry of the kidney was within normal range. The proteinuria dissolved spontaneously, and a microhematuria persisted. One day after the second dose of Cominarty in November 2021, the gross hematuria with proteinuria relapsed. A treatment with an ACE-inhibitor did not have any effect on the proteinuria. At this point, only a few casereports of patients with a comparable clinical course, especially from Japan, were published. In suspicion of a vaccine-triggered nephritis we started a prednisolon therapy which dissolved the proteinuria and induced a regression of the haematuria to a minimal stage. Conclusion(s): Within the last year, the medical community has gained more insights concerning mRNA vaccines. There is growing evidence, that mRNA vaccines can trigger de novo or relapse IgA nephropathy. But more systematic research and long-term evaluation is desirable to elucidate the underling pathophysiology as well as the influence on kidney survival of affected patients in the future. Furthermore, patient education should incorporate the risk of hematuria and proteinuria in children when applying mRNA vaccines.
ABSTRACT
Like the challenges and skepticism that faced the antibody therapeutics field over a decade ago, RNA therapeutics is facing the same. And, like the antibody therapeutics field, we are beginning to realize the clinical impact of RNA therapeutics amiss these challenges. This is most clearly highlighted with the recent approval of mRNA vaccines to prevent against SARS-CoV-2 and the first FDA approved RNAi drugs targeted to the liver. Unfortunately, RNA-based drugs targeted to cancer cells is lagging behind, even with countless years of work that has revealed the power of using RNAi for treating oncological diseases. Lack of success in this space is attributed to inability to deliver RNAi safely and effectively. A successful delivery agent requires multiple features. First, the agent must deliver the RNA specifically to the intended cells. Second, the agent must have a large therapeutic window, meaning that toxicity, if observed, should occur at doses that are orders of magnitude higher than the therapeutic dose. Third, if delivery of the RNA is by way of a specific ligand and receptor pair, as is the case herein, the RNA must successfully escape the endosome. Simply swelling the endosome is not enough if noncovalent interactions between the ligand and the receptor cannot be disrupted. Fourth, the RNA should include appropriate stabilizing modifications to increase intracellular half-life that will reduce dosing and cost. Through hard work and dedication in this space, we have come up with an inclusive, easily synthesized, intramolecular molecule that achieves all of these essential features. Moreover, the ligand used to achieve successful delivery is also being evaluated for imaging tumors localized in the central nervous system. Here, the challenges we face, the hurdles we have overcome, and the barriers that still remain to achieve success in revealing the clinical potential of miRNA as anti-cancer therapeutics will be presented.
ABSTRACT
A case report of 52-years-old male with erythema nodosum, fever and malaise that developed seven days after second dose of mRNA vaccine Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) against coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. The most common causes of erythema nodosum were ruled out and the patient was treated with systemic corticotherapy with a very good effect. Because of the time association between the development of erythema nodosum and the second dose of mRNA vaccine, findings of high titres of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the blood, the case was reported to national regulation authority (State Institute for Drug Control) as a possible side effect of the mRNA vaccine Comirnaty.Copyright © 2021, EEZY Publishing, s.r.o.. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Cumulative data regardingCOVID-19 infection during pregnancy have demonstrated the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect the placenta. However, the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 placental viral entry are yet to be defined. SARS-CoV-2 infects cells by binding to the ACE2 receptor. However, SARS-CoV-2 cell entry also requires co-localization of spike protein cleavage by the serine protease TMPRSS2. However, the co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in placental cells is debated, raising the question of whether potential non-canonical molecular mechanismsmay be involved in SARS-CoV-2 placental cells' viral entry. Although published data regarding the ability of the SARS-CoV- 2 to infect the fetus are contradicting, the placenta appears to be an immunological barrier to active SARS-CoV-2 infection and vertical transmission;however, the mechanism is unclear. Our experiments demonstrated the ability of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to directly infect the placenta and induce transcriptomic responses in COVID-positive mothers. These transcriptomic responses were characterized by differential expression of specific mRNAs and miRNAs associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, with induction of specific placental miRNAs that can inhibit viral replication. Failure in such mechanisms may be associated with vertical transmission. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have been widely used to reduce the morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Historically, non-live vaccines have not caused any harm to pregnant mothers;however, it is unclear whether our current understanding of the effects of non-live vaccines serves as a reliable precedent owing to the novel technology used to create these mRNA vaccines. Since there are no definitive data on the possible biodistribution of mRNA vaccines to the placenta, the likelihood of vaccine mRNA reaching the fetus remains uncertain. Little has been reported on the tissue localization of the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) after intramuscular (IM) administration of the mRNA vaccine. The biodistribution of LNPs containing the mRNA vaccine has been investigated in animal models but not humans. In the murine model, the vaccine LNPs were rapidly disseminated to several organs, including the heart, liver, kidney, lung, and spleen, following IM administration. However, no traditional pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been performed with the mRNA vaccines, including possible biodistribution to breast milk or the placenta.
ABSTRACT
Background: Intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) Immunoglobulin G (IG) replacement products are in wide use in patients with primary antibody deficiency syndrome (PAD). There is limited data on the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies in IG products or their ability to neutralize emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. There is lack of data on the impact of IG therapy on serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike or neutralizing antibody titers in PAD patients. Method(s): We measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels and neutralizing titers against historical (WA1/2020) and variant (B.1.617.2 [Delta] and BA.1 [Omicron]) strains in 158 lots of 6 different IG products, collected between August 2021 to April 2022 and manufactured between December 2019 to December 2021. IG products were compared to serum from 20 healthy donors vaccinated with 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. Serum anti-spike antibody level and SARS-CoV-2 neutralization activity were measured in 27 PAD patients treated with the tested IG products. Result(s): Anti-spike antibody titers started to increase in products manufactured in March 2021 and reached peak level, comparable to vaccinated healthy donors, in products manufactured in August 2021 (Fig. 1). The neutralization activity against WA1/2020 and Delta strains showed a similar pattern (Fig. 2). However, 95% of the tested products had no neutralization activity against Omicron. Until November 2021, IVIG products infused to patients in the study had anti-spike titers comparable to unvaccinated healthy donors (Fig. 3). Beginning in February 2022, IVIG products had anti-spike titers comparable to vaccinated healthy controls. Concurrent with a rise in anti-spike antibodies in IG products, PAD patients showed an increase in serum levels of anti-spike antibody and neutralizing activity against WA1/202 and Delta but not against Omicron variants. Testing of immunoglobulin replacement products neutralization activity against emerging variants BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 is underway.[Formula presented][Formula presented][Formula presented] Conclusion(s): The anti-SARS spike antibody and neutralization activity of IVIG products lags after the emergence of COVID-19 variants and currently have poor activity against Omicron strain. Because of the protracted manufacturing process, this is expected to be an ongoing challenge. As variants emerge, clinicians should consider additional means of protection for PAD patients such as vaccination, or prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
ABSTRACT
Problem: Despite being over 3 years into the pandemic, infants remain highly undervaccinated and at a high risk for hospitalization due to COVID-19. Further investigation as to how maternal health decisions for immunization can reduce morbidity from infant COVID-19 by providing passive immunity is necessary. The objective of this study was to describe the rates of SARS-CoV-2 variant antibody transfer from mother to infant cord blood by trimester ofmaternal vaccination. Methods of study: This is an observational cohort study including mother-infant dyads receiving primary or subsequent booster COVID- 19 vaccines during pregnancy.Unvaccinated, but SARS-CoV-2 infected dyads with were included as a comparison group. We quantified median titer and interquartile range (IQR) for SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG in infant cord blood samples at delivery using the mesoscale discovery platform (electrochemiluminescence). Primary outcome was infant cord IgG titer by trimester of vaccination for the WA1/2022 RBD IgG and current circulating, immune evasive XBB RBD IgG. Secondary outcome is the percent detectable IgG for each variant. Sensitivity analysis was performed based on known SARS-CoV-2 infection. Result(s): Eighty-three mother-infant dyads were included in this analysis. Seven were vaccinated in the first trimester, 37 in the second trimester, 33 in the third trimester, and 6 were unvaccinated and infected. Twenty-three (30%) of the vaccinated group had known SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most received monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy, aside from two who received the viralvectored Ad26.COV2.S, and two received the bivalent mRNA vaccine during pregnancy. The median cord blood WA1/2020 RBD IgG titer was 5370 (412-7296) for first, 1225 (589-3289) for second, 2623 (664-5809) for third trimester in individuals who received aCOVID-19 vaccine dose during pregnancy, and 45 (10-187) in those unvaccinated and infected. After excluding thosewith infection, the cord blood IgG was 514 (106-4182), 1070 (518-2317), and 2477 (664-4470) for first, second, and third trimester, respectively. The rate of detectable WA1/2020 RBD IgG was 100% for all three trimesters, even when excluding infected individuals. For theXBBvariant, cord bloodRBDIgG titer was 284 (43-1296) for first, 66 (32-227) for second, 173 (45-389) for third trimester, and 10 (10-11) in the unvaccinated/infected group. Excluding infections, the cord blood XBB RBD IgG was 54 (10-128), 44 (25-181), and 152 (45-360) for first, second, and third trimester vaccination, respectively. The rate of detectable XBB IgG in those who received a vaccine during pregnancy were 83%, 91%, and 90% for first, second, and third trimester respectively, compared to 17% in the unvaccinated/infected group. Excluding infections, the rate of XBB RBD IgG detection was 66%, 89%, and 95% for first, second, and third trimester vaccination, respectively. Conclusion(s): Vaccination during pregnancy leads to high rates of detectable cord blood IgG specific to SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 variant and current circulating variants (XBB), regardless of trimester of vaccination. Infection history leads to higher cord blood IgG in vaccinated;however, infection alone without vaccination leads to lower titer and greater rates of undetectable cord IgG at delivery.
ABSTRACT
Vaccinating children against Covid raised a debate, due to generally mild clinical presentation. The decision to vaccinate teenagers was motivated by the global public health need: to decrease transmission to other age groups. Among adolescents, the efficacy (better immunity than in young adults) and safety of vaccines was clearly demonstrated. Among 5-to-12-year-olds, due to lower contamination the collective benefit is less clear, and when the m-RNA vaccines were available for this age group, the Omicron variant was predominant and their effect on non-severe infections and transmission had yet to be determined. Individual benefit is based both on somatic criteria and on the child's schooling and mental health. Children under 5 years of age received a 3lg dose of vaccine, which is one tenth of the adult dose, resulting in immunogenicity similar to that of 16-to-25-year-olds.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are reduced in adult kidney recipients. After pediatric kidney transplantation there are only few data available - mostly limited to monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Method(s): Cellular and humoral immune responses have been monitored before and after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pediatric kidney recipients. After in vitro stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 antigen (spike glycoprotein) virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells (SARS-CoV-2-Tvis) have been identified by cytokine flow cytometry. SARS-CoV-2 IgG was measured by CMIA. Result(s): Immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was analyzed in a total of 30 pediatric kidney recipients (age at 1st vaccine dose 5.2 - 17.8 years, median 14.8 years;43% male;30/30 2 vaccine doses;23/30 3 vaccine doses). At time of vaccination 22 patients (73%) received a tacrolimus (Tac)-based immunosuppression combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF;n = 15) or everolimus (n = 6) or neither of them (n = 1);3 patients were exposed to cyclosporine A and 5 patients to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- free immunosuppression. MMF was used in 18/30 patients. After 1st dose of mRNA vaccine SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detectable in 50% of pediatric kidney recipients, after 2nd dose in 78% and after 3rd dose in 88%. After the 2nd vaccine dose absence of humoral immune response (< 33.8 BAU/ml) was only found in case of MMF use (predominately combined with Tac). Peak IgG values (> 2,080 BAU/ml) were only detected in MMF-free regimens (6/7). Cellmediated response partially differed from humoral response, e. g., in some patients SARS-CoV2-Tvis were found despite lack of virus-specific antibodies. After 1st vaccine dose SARS-CoV-2-Tvis were detectable in 50% of pediatric kidney recipients, after 2nd dose in 92%. After 2nd vaccine dose absence or very low levels of SARS-CoV-2-Tvis (< 0.3 cells/mul) were only found in Tac-based immunosuppressive regimens, whereas higher levels (> 1.3 cells/mul) were exclusively detected in patients with MMFfree medication. Conclusion(s): After pediatric kidney transplantation humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were suboptimal, but more pronounced than in adult kidney recipients. Use of Tac and MMF was associated with impaired immune response to vaccination. SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral response corresponded only partially to cell-mediated response. Additional monitoring of SARS-CoV- 2-Tvis might be recommendable to improve assessment of the individual vaccine response and thereby to personalize the decision on the necessity of further vaccine doses.
ABSTRACT
Heterologous prime boost vaccination is a primary vaccination with different vaccines, most often from different vaccine platforms. It combines the immunological properties of the different vaccines and thereby induces humoral, cellular and, in some cases, mucosal response. For Covid prevention, it has been used in primary vaccination, due to safety issues and in boosters. We have evaluated some articles reporting on the results of this type of vaccine, and demonstrating its usefulness.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , Immunization, Secondary/methods , Vaccination/methodsABSTRACT
Vaccination has been proved to be the most effective strategy to prevent the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The mRNA vaccine based on nano drug delivery system (NDDS) - lipid nanoparticles (LNP) has been widely used because of its high effectiveness and safety. Although there have been reports of severe allergic reactions caused by mRNA-LNP vaccines, the mechanism and components of anaphylaxis have not been completely clarified yet. This review focuses on two mRNA-LNP vaccines, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. After summarizing the structural characteristics, potential allergens, possible allergic reaction mechanism, and pharmacokinetics of mRNA and LNP in vivo, this article then reviews the evaluation methods for patients with allergic history, as well as the regulations of different countries and regions on people who should not be vaccinated, in order to promote more safe injection of vaccines. LNP has become a recognized highly customizable nucleic acid delivery vector, which not only shows its value in mRNA vaccines, but also has great potential in treating rare diseases, cancers and other broad fields in the future. At the moment when mRNA-LNP vaccines open a new era of nano medicine, it is expected to provide some inspiration for safety research in the process of research, development and evaluation of more nano delivery drugs, and promote more nano drugs successfully to market.Copyright © 2023, Chinese Pharmaceutical Association. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims: The global pandemic of COVID-19 has caused tremendous loss of human life since 2019. Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is one of the best policies to control the pandemic. The vaccination efficacy in Taiwanese patients with different comorbidities is elusive and to be explored. Method(s): Uninfected subjects who received 3-doses of mRNA vaccines (Moderna, BioNTech), non-replicating viral vector-based vaccines (AstraZeneca, AZ) or protein subunit vaccines (Medigen COVID-19 vaccine, MVC) were prospectively enrolled. SARSCoV2- IgG spike antibody level was determined (Abbott [SARS-CoV- 2 IgG II]) within 3 months after the last dose of vaccination. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was applied to disclose the association of vaccine titer and underlying comorbidities. Result(s): A total of 824 subjects were enrolled in the current study. The mean age was 58.9 years and males accounted for 48.7% of the population. The proportion of CCI with 0-1, 2-3 and>4 was 52.8% (n = 435), 31.3% (n = 258) and 15.9% (n = 131), respectively. The most commonly used vaccination combination was AZ-AZ-Moderna (39.2%), followed by Moderna-Moderna-Moderna (27.8%) and AZAZ- BioNTech (14.7%), respectively. The mean vaccination titer was 3.11 log BAU/mL after a median 48 days of the 3rd dose. Subjects of male gender, lower body mass index, chronic kidney disease, higher CCI, and receiving AZ-AZ based vaccination were likely to have a lower titer of antibody. There was a decreasing trend of antibody titer with the increase of CCT (trend P<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that AZ-AZ-based vaccination (beta: 0.341, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.144, 0.21, P<0.001) and higher CCI (beta: - 0.055, CI: - 0.096, - 0.014, P = 0.009) independently correlated with low IgG spike antibody levels. Conclusion(s): Patients with more comorbidities had a poor response to 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccination. Further studies are warranted to clarify the efficacy of booster vaccination in the population. The vaccine titer did not differ between patient with or without chronic liver disease.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) are commonly treated with immunosuppressors and are prone to infections. Recently introduced mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines have demonstrated extraordinary efficacy across all ages. Immunosuppressed patients were excluded from phase III trials with SARS-We aim to fully characterize B and T cell immune responses elicited by mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines in patients with rheumatic diseases under immunotherapies, and to identify which drugs reduce vaccine's immunogenicity. Methods Humoral, CD4 and CD8 immune responses were investigated in 147 SARS-Cov2-naive patients with selected rheumatic diseases under immunosuppression after a two-dose regimen of SARS-Cov2 mRNA vaccine. Responses were compared with age, gender, and diseasematched IMRD patients not receiving immunosuppressors and with healthy controls Results IMRD patients showed decreased seroconversion rates (63% vs 100%, p=0.04) and cellular immune responses (59% vs 100%, p=0.007). Patients on methotrexate achieved seroconversion in 62% of cases and cellular responses in 80% of cases. Abatacept deeply affected humoral and cellular responses. Rituximab (31% responders) and belimumab (50% responders) showed severely impaired humoral responses but cellular responses were often preserved. Antibody titers were reduced with mycophenolate and azathioprine but preserved with leflunomide. Conclusion IMRD patients exhibit impaired SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-immunogenicity, variably reduced with immunosuppressors. Among commonly used therapies, abatacept and B-cell depleting therapies show the most deleterious effects, while anticytokines preserved immunogenicity. The effects of cumulative methotrexate and glucocorticoid doses on immunogenicity should be considered. Humoral and cellular responses are weakly correlated, but CD4 and CD8 tightly correlate. Seroconversion alone might not reflect the vaccine's immunogenicity.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: COVID-19 pandemic has made an extraordinary impact on global vaccine technology platform developments. Never in human history have there at least 6 vaccine platforms including: inactivated, protein subunit, VLP and other 3 new platforms i.e., mRNA, viral vector, and DNA, with more than 160 vaccine candidates being developed and tested in clinical trials. Nonetheless, among these several vaccine platforms, mRNA vaccine has been proven to be one of the most effective vaccines against COVID-19. There are two mRNA vaccines authorized for emergency use within a year and currently more than 20 mRNA vaccines are in clinical trials. The main advantages of mRNA vaccines are that they are speedily to design and develop, induce strong antibody and T-cell responses, manufacturing faster and at a lower cost. However, one of the major limitations is that it must be stored in cold temperatures. Currently more than billion doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have been given globally. mRNA vaccines will be a key platform for next pandemics preparedness, it is therefore establishing this platform in various regions and LMICs is critical. Beyond COVID-19: A number of viral and cancer mRNA vaccines have been developing even before COVID-19. At least 12 mRNA vaccines against various infectious diseases are now in clinical evaluation, including Chikungunya virus, Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, Human metapneumovirus and parainfluenza virus type3, HIV, Influenza, Nipah, Rabies, Lasa, RSV, Zika, Varicella-zoster virus. Only few are entering phase 3 such as a CMV vaccine, RSV, seasonal influenza. Current mRNA cancer vaccines development, including brain, breast, melanoma, esophagus, lung, ovarian, prostate and solid tumors. Most are aimed for personalized therapy. By 2023, at least 1 viral mRNA vaccine may get approval, whereas a cancer vaccine might take much longer time. Nevertheless, the remaining challenge at the global level is how to truly overcome the vaccine inequity issues in a sustainable way.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine affects sperm morphokinetics using a computer-assisted semen analyzer and other semen parameters using a sperm chromatin structure assay. Method(s): Healthy male volunteers in two Japanese clinics between May 2021 and December 2021 were prospectively analyzed. Participants donated sperm twice, two days apart, in the following phases: before vaccination, 2 weeks after the first vaccine dose, and 2, 4, and 12 weeks after the second dose. Basic sperm parameters, sperm motility characteristics, and the percentage of DNA-damaged sperm were compared among the different phases. Result(s): Ninety-six semen samples from ten volunteers, who were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, were evaluated. There were no significant differences between any phases in basic semen findings and parameters of the sperm chromatin structure assays. Regarding sperm motion characteristics, the average linear velocity, beat-cross frequency, and sperm motility index significantly decreased after the second vaccine dose (P=0.018, P=0.003, and P=0.027, respectively), with no significant differences between any two phases by post-hoc pairwise comparisons. Conclusion(s): After COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, while sperm motion characteristics might fluctuate, no apparent deterioration of basic sperm parameters or sperm DNA integrity was observed. Given the adverse effects of COVID-19 on sperm, our findings suggest that there might be no reason to refrain from vaccination for healthy individuals.Copyright © 2023 Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction Produced by Wolters Kluwer- Medknow.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Subacute thyroiditis is a self-limiting post-viral inflammatory disorder occurring in 3 phases (hyper-, hypo-, and euthyroidism) Post-vaccine thyroiditis has also been reported, but is rare. Case Description: A 36-year-old Emirati female presented to our clinic with generalized fatigue, mild to moderate vague neck pain, intermittent palpitations, and loss of appetite 2 weeks after receiving her first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine against COVID-19. Clinical examination findings and laboratory test results were consistent with subacute thyroiditis. Patient is a mother of 5 healthy children, youngest is breast-fed infant (11 months old). There was no history suggestive of postpartum thyroiditis and no family history of thyroid dysfunction. Physical examination at initial visit showed mild tachycardia, and a normal blood pressure. She weighed 66 kg. Thyroid function tests revealed a suppressed TSH of 0.011 muIU/mL, high Free T4 of >100 pmol/l), and Free T3 FT3 of 29.6 pmol/L. Both TSH receptor antibodies, and Thyroid antibodies (TPO) were negative. Thyroid scintigraphy showed decreased uptake in both lobes. Thyroid ultrasound showed hypoechoic heterogeneous echotexture of the thyroid gland with vascular conglomerate and micro-calcification, along with normal sized reactive lymph nodes at sternal angle. Symptoms aggravated through the next week;patient dropped 3kg of her body weight and her palpitations increased, with a recorded resting heart rate between 120-130 beats/min. TSH decreased to 0.001muIU/mL while FT4 remained high, with an improvement to 90 pmol/L. Subsequently, the patient started to regain weight. Palpitations improved within a month. She developed a biochemically hypothyroid picture followed by clinical and biochemical euthyroidism after one more month. Second dose of the vaccine was uneventful. Last evaluation was 10 months later;TSH, FT3 and FT4 were all in normal range, acute-phase reactants were completely normal and in complete remission. Discussion(s): The exact mechanism for post-vaccination subacute thyroiditis remains unknown, vaccine adjuvants may induce diverse autoimmune and inflammatory reaction. Subacute thyroiditis has rarely been reported with other COVID-19 vaccines contains no Polyethylene glycol (PEG). A possible cross-reactivity between thyroid cell antigens and spike protein of the coronavirus produced by mRNA vaccines might be responsible. Further research is needed to investigate the incidence of subacute thyroiditis in COVID-19 pandemic days.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Currently five SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are approved in North America (FDA) and Europe (EMA). Across the world other vaccines have been developed but not approved in high-income countries. Of the approved vaccines, 2 are mRNA vaccines, 2 are viral vectored vaccines, and 1 is a protein subunit vaccine. As immunogenicity markers are increasingly being used by regulatory agencies as surrogate markers for vaccine efficacy to inform authorization decisions, this meta-analysis compared the size of immunogenicity responses response elicited by the different COVID-19 vaccine types (mRNA, protein subunit, inactivated virus, viral vectors) and approved and unapproved COVID-19 vaccines. Method(s): Systematic review of trial registers and databases identified RCTs for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Risk of bias analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. High risk of bias studies were excluded from analysis. Meta-analysis of seroconversion rates and geometric antibody titers (GMT) for neutralising (NAb) and anti-spike antibodies was conducted, each compared with a placebo using random effects model Cochrane-Mantel Haenszel Tests. Result(s): All studies assessed immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines on healthy non-immunocompromised adults between the age of 18 and 59. Statistically significant difference was identified between the different vaccine types for NAb GMT, anti-spike GMT, NAb seroconversion, and anti-spike seroconversion (P< 0.00001 for all). Conversely, no statistical significant difference was identified between approved and unapproved vaccines for NAb seroconversion (P=0.39), Nab GMT (P=0.36), anti-spike seroconversion (P=0.07), and antispike GMT (P=0.54). mRNA vaccines had the best immunogenicity results for NAb seroconversion, GMT, and anti-spike seroconversion. Viral vector vaccines had the lowest results for NAb seroconversion and GMT, while inactivated viruses had the lowest result for anti-spike seroconversion and mRNA vaccines for anti-spike GMT. High heterogeneity was observed across the different studies. Conclusion(s): This metanalysis of 35 randomised trials in 33,813 participants showed approved and unapproved vaccines to be comparable in postvaccination GMT values and seroconversion for both NAb and anti-spike. However, while comparing COVID-19 vaccines by vaccine types, statistically significant differences are observed. Variations in study designs, populations enrolled, and infection prevalence during trial duration could have influenced results.